Archives

  • Find out Facts About Corporal Punishment And Discipline In American Schools

    Post Image

    Corporal punishment is a necessary evil in disciplining students. If left to do what they feel right, students can be notorious and eventually be a security risk in the United States of America. Consequently, the use of corporal punishment is necessary.

    What is corporal punishment?

    This refers to allowing intentional pain and discomfort in response to ill behaviours among students.It mostly involves;

    -Stroking the buttocks or the hands with a stick ,slippers or any other wooden material to inflict pain.

    -spanking or smacking the students with an open hand.This is especially common at the elementary level

    History of corporal punishment in American schools

    The United States Supreme Court has allowed corporal punishment in 19 States of America. This form of punishment has been popular among teachers.

    Legislations are being put in place to give the teachers the authority to apply it. A good example is the Alabama Act of 1995 that provides immunity to teachers and other authorised staff in school who use corporal punishment.

    Other States of America that has made legislation to allow the punishment including Arizona, Florida, Colorado among others.

    Impact of the Legislation

    -Educationists in America have argued that corporal punishment gives quick results to in discipline cases when compared to suspension

    -Discipline is inculcated in students at an early age.This positively reflects in the country’s security and economic sectors.

    Conclusion

    Corporal punishment is legal in some states of America. Children are stubborn, and if measures are not put in place, the levels of indiscipline may reach unacceptable levels. Application of corporal punishment, within set guidelines, is, therefore, necessary.

  • Corporal Punishment In The British Army:Find Out The Facts And History Of Corporal Punishment In British Army

    Post Image

    The Army is meant to protect the country against external invasions.Due to their vital duty,corporal punishment for soldiers may sound like a selfish act.It is, however, true that the rate of indiscipline cases in British Army need to be trimmed before it poses a danger to the entire country.

    History of corporal punishment in British Army

    -Obedience is essential in any military setting.In 1867, offences such as insubordination in the army were punished by confinement.They were either in separate or mixed detention camps.

    -In solitary prison, the prisoners were only allowed to get out for fresh air in limited times.On the other hand, mixed prison was marked by forced labour such as breaking stones and cleaning barracks

    -In 1881, flogging was introduced as a form of corporal punishment.This was an inhumane way that saw the Duke of Cambridge intervene.He classified the soldiers into two during admission.The first group were not to receive corporal punishment unless due to interrupted proper conduct.

    -Lashing was also used where lashes were used to incur bruises on the skin.It was done in phases, and just when the skin is about to heal, it would be redone.

    -Caning is a common form of punishment even today.Whipping of disobedient soldiers is done by designated officials

    Benefits of the corporal punishment in British Army

    -The discussion on the success of harsh punishments to soldiers has been a subject of debate for a long time now.

    -Some citizens are not impressed with the form of pain inflicted by this punishments.The argument is that the result can be achieved in more humane ways.

    -Other quotas, however, feel it has been a success and that it has raised discipline levels among soldiers.

    Conclusion

    Discipline in the British Army is necessary.While the method used is debatable, there should be mechanisms to ensure that the best methods of instilling a high level of discipline in the soldiers are discovered and implemented.

  • About Page

    Post Image

    There are many different things which have changed over time, with one of the things being how we now punish different people for different crimes, rather than just going over the top like we did in the past. There are still some people who like to call for the death penalty on a regular basis, but we as humans are better than that.

    What our aim is here, is to take a look at some of the crimes that have seen their punishment changing over the years, while also discussing whether the punishment does always fit the crime. Are we being too harsh on some and too easy on others? That is what we are looking to find out.